Comparing Quick and Sleep Sorting Algorithms

Published on Wednesday, March 27, 2024 (3 weeks ago)

Wether you’re a beginner or a greatly experienced developer, this comparison will come in handy to find the fastest of two sorting algorithms. Namely quick and sleep.

Instead of a wall-of-text, we’ll get into the nitty-gritty right away!

Quick Sort

Quick sort is a powerful sorting algorithm that belongs to the divide-and-conquer family. It works by first selecting a pivot element from the unsorted list. Then, it rearranges the list by placing elements smaller than the pivot to its left and elements larger than the pivot to its right. This process is called partitioning. Finally, quicksort recursively sorts the two sub-lists on either side of the pivot, effectively sorting the entire list.

The efficiency of quicksort hinges on the choice of the pivot element. In the average case, with a randomly chosen pivot, quicksort has a time complexity of O(nlogn)O(n \log n), making it one of the fastest sorting algorithms. This means the number of comparisons it takes to sort a list grows proportionally to the logarithm of the number of elements.

We first heard about quicksort in 1959 (published 1961) from the British computer scientist Sir Charles Antony Richard Hoare.

However, quicksort’s Achilles’ heel is its worst-case performance. If the pivot element consistently ends up being the largest or smallest element in the list, the algorithm degrades to O(n2)O(n^2) complexity. This can happen with already sorted or reverse-sorted data.

Sleep Sort

The sleep sorting algorithm is amongst some of the newer algorithms. It was first posted on the anonymous imageboard, “forum”-like, 4chan in 2011. This has later gotten a lot attention on Hacker News.

It is mostly known to be a joke algorithm, and does not have many real-life use-cases. The original implementation is simply “sorting” by waiting the the amount of the current number at the current number in milliseconds.

Its big-o is definitely not one of the best, being O(n2)O(n^2).

Comparison

We will start, with an array of 3500 random (hopefully distinct) floating-point values, to test our two sorting algorithms.

Now that we have some data to test on, we want to add the algorithm for the quick sort. This goes as follows.

And of course the sleep sort as well, otherwise we won’t have anything to compare against.

Now, let’s test the two against one another.

If you want to read about something else here is a collection of some different sorting algorithms. You can also navigate directly to the implementation of quick sort VS. sleep sort, this is espescially useful if you want to manipulate each of these algorithms yourself.

Running this benchmark against the quick sort and sleep sort, we will notice that one is 373528.00x faster than the other, which is … drum roll, please! The great quick sorting algorithm!

This means we can almost run the quick sort algorithm almost up to 373529 times in the time it takes sleep sort to run once!

Artificial Intelligence

We asked a well-known Artificial Intelligence (A.I. for short, AI for the lazy and ai for the lazier) to nickname our winner, the quick sort, and this shall hence on be known as ”The Quickfire Ninja“!

To be fair, of course, we also asked for one for our lesser speedy algorithm, the sleep sort, which is now known as ”The Snooze Button“.

Epilogue

Does this mean you should always choose the quick sorting algorithm when you implement a new app? Well, not exactly… Please do remember that, as with everything in life, there are pros and cons as well, so choose wisely!

There are a lot of other sorting algorithms out there. Yet more to be discovered! Who knows, you might find the next one with an immersive speed increase or magnificent memory benefits!


Thanks for reading, and I truly hope this will better your understanding of the speed of quick and sleep sorting algorithms.

More posts are available on the blog.